clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Brantly's annotated Bland's Reports, Chancery Court 1809-1832
Volume 198, Volume 2, Page 611   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

ANDREWS v. SCOTTON.—2 BLAND. 611

stances, * should be obtained; and the sale should be in all
respects a fair and honest one. These are the ends in view. 644
To attain them, in England, if after the biddings are closed, any-
one else comes in and offers a much higher price, the biddings may
be opened, and the additional offer accepted. This phrase of
"opening the biddings." which, in the English books, occur so
frequently, means no more than a further suspension of the sale,
and a continuance of the property in the market. Sugd. Vend. &
Pur. 45. In this State, there has been no instance of opening the
biddings or suspending the sale merely to let in another and a
higher bid, and for no other cause. But in this State, as well as in
England, if there should be made to appear, either before or after
the sale has been ratified, any injurious mistake, misrepresentation
or fraud, the biddings may be opened, the reported sale rejected,
or the order of ratification rescinded, and the property again sent
into the market and re-sold.

As to sales under the authority of this Court, it has long been
well established, that any circumstance shewing that the sale was
injurious to the parties concerned, or that a better sale might rea-
sonably and probably have been made, is sufficient to prevent a
ratification. It is not incumbent on the party objecting to shew
favoritism, or an improper motive, although such proof would
furnish conclusive inducement for rejecting the proposed sale.
But where the property of infants was to be sold, even a strong
doubt of the propriety of the sale has been deemed sufficient to
prevent its ratification. And if, in any case, the trustee reports,
that there was an error, mistake, misunderstanding, or misrepre-
sentation as to the terms or manner of the sale, it may be at once
rejected, and a re-sale ordered without further inquiry. Objec-
tions are seldom or ever made by any others than those directly
interested. But the Court, in acting as proprietor, or as if the
property were its own, and in deciding on the merits of a sale,
will avail itself of information from every quarter from which it
may be derived; that is, from the original parties to the suit, or the
creditors for whose satisfaction the sale is to be made, or from any
other person. In such cases, however, much more attention will
be paid to objections coming from those who are interested than
from volunteers. But it is not unusual, with the consent of all .
parties interested, to ratify the sale immediately on its being
reported, without giving any notice or time for objections to be
made by others.

* Where land has been sold, under the authority of this
Court, by the tract or in parcels, containing so many acres, 645
"more or less," the sale will not be rejected, nuless the deficiency,
should it be objected to on that account, be material and con-
siderable. It has been established as the law of the land office,
by the Proprietary's instructions, as far back as the year 1684, that

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Brantly's annotated Bland's Reports, Chancery Court 1809-1832
Volume 198, Volume 2, Page 611   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives