clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Brantly's annotated Bland's Reports, Chancery Court 1809-1832
Volume 198, Volume 2, Page 490   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

490 WATKINS v.WORTHINGTON.—2 BLAND.

creditors of the deceased to file the vouchers of their claims within
four months from the day of sale.

After which, Elizabeth R. Worthiugton, by her petition, stated,
that she was the widow of the late Beale M. Worthiugton, and as
such, was entitled to dower in the real estate, of which he died
* seized, and which had been decreed to be sold. Where-
upon she prayed, that a commission might be issued, to as-
sign dower to her. And recommended Thomas H. Dorsey, James
Wells, Eli Lusby, Jacob Waters, and Caleb Dorsey, to he ap-
pointed commissioners for that purpose.

BLAND. C., 2d July, 1828.—The hill states, that- Beale M.
Worthiugton, the deceased, left a widow, Elizabeth R. Worthing-
ton, and the infant children, these defendants, his heirs; and then
prays, that the real estate of the deceased may be sold for the pay-
ment of his debts. Hence, taking this petitioner to be the widow
mentioned in the bill, it virtually recognizes her legal right to
dower; and, therefore, there need he no hesitation in at once, ac-
cording to the established course of the Court in similar cases,
either granting a commission to have dower assigned to her, or in
directing the land to be sold subject to her claim; or in awarding
to her a proportion of the purchase money in lieu thereof. But, as
in this case, the widow is not a party to the suit; and the defen-
dants are infants; it may not be amiss to allow the plaintiff's to
show cause, if any they have, why a commission should not issue
as prayed, leaving the application open to any further objections
when the Court shall, upon the return of the commissioners, be
called on for a decree confirming the assignment of dower so made
to her. Mildred v. Neill, ante, 354; Ewing v. Ennals, ante, 356.

Ordered, that a commission issue as prayed, to the persons re-
commended; unless cause to the contrary be shewn on the Kith in-
stant; provided, that a copy of this order, together with a copy of
the aforegoing petition and recommendation be served on the
plaintiffs or their solicitor, on or before the 9th instant.

The plaintiffs consented that a commission should issue as
prayed, which was issued accordingly. Upon which, the commis-
sioners made return, that they had assigned to the widow her
dower, according to certain metes and bounds as therein specified,
and as shewn by the annexed plot thereof, (e)

(e} It appears from the auditor's report, subsequently made and passed
upon in this case, that the expenses of the survey for making the assign-
ment of dower, were allowed out of the proceeds of the sale; but no decree
confirming to the widow her dower, was ever called for or passed.

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Brantly's annotated Bland's Reports, Chancery Court 1809-1832
Volume 198, Volume 2, Page 490   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives