CAMPBELL'S CASE.—2 BLAND. 195

And it is further decreed, that the defendant John Diffenderffer,
pay unto the plaintiffs William S. Winder and Araminta, his wife,
or bring into this Court to be paid to them, the sum of $13,060.58,
with legal interest thereon, from the 8th day of November, 1828,
until paid or brought into Court.

And it is further decreed, that the defendant John Diffenderffer,
pay utito the defendant Amelia Diffenderffer, or bring into this
Court to be paid to her, the sum of $8,707.05, with legal interest
thereon, from the 8th day of November, 1828, until paid or
brought in.

And it is further decreed, that the defendant John Diffenderffer,
pay unto the defendant Michael Diffenderffer, or bring into this
Court to be paid to him, the sum of $8,707.05, with legal interest
thereon, from the 8th day of November, 1828, until paid or
brought in.

*And it is further decreed, that the defendant John Diffen-
derffer, pay unto the defendant Charles E. Diffenderffer, or 209
bring into this Court to be paid to him, the sum of -$8,707.05, with
legal interest thereon, from the 8th day of November, 1828, until
paid or brought in.

And it is further decreed, that the defendant John Diffenderffer,
pay unto the plaintiffs, and to each one of the other parties, their
costs in this suit arising under the said decree to account _to be
taxed by the register.

See the report of this case as disposed of by the Court of Ap-
peals, 3 G. & J. 311.

CAMPBELL'S CASE.

LUNATIC AND INFANT DEFENDANTS.—SALE OF PROPERTY IN A CREDITOR'S
SUIT.—DEVISE FOR PAYMENT OF DEBTS.—PRIVATE ACTS OF ASSEMBLY.—
STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION.—CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.—Lis PENDENS.

Where an estate has been devised to be sold to pay debts, the trustee who
has accepted the trust, may be ordered to proceed accordingly, and to
sell, as directed by the will, real estate lying out of this State.

Trustees," on failing to give bond as required, may be removed, and another
trustee appointed, (a)

On petition and affidavit a writ de lutiatico inquirendo may be issued.

It should be directed to the county in which the person alleged to be insane
resides; but if he be not within the State, it should be directed to the
county in which he last resided; and in some cases, his appearance before
the inquest may be dispensed with.

(a) See Dorsey v. Thompson, 37 Md. 46; Fulton v. Barman, 44 Md. S66;
Cowman v. Colquhoun, 60 Md. 136.