clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Brantly's annotated Bland's Reports, Chancery Court 1809-1832
Volume 198, Page 50   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

50 STRIKE'S CASE.—1 BLAND.

Court had told him should remain no longer idle, but be made pro-
ductive in the manner pointed out; and, not having done so, he
is clearly chargeable with interest.

Whereupon it is ordered, that Nicholas Brewer, the said trustee,
forthwith bring into this Court the sum of $1,393.22, as stated by
the account marked C, as part of the auditor's report returned on
the 6th of July last, together with interest on the said sum of
money from the 6th day of April last.

Some time after which, the case was again brought before the
Court, by a motion of the solicitor of the representatives of the late
Charles Wallace, the petition of Sarah H. Smith, and others, filed
on the 18th August, 1825, having been dismissed.

BLAND, C., 30th March, 1826.—Ordered, that the auditor's state-
ment of the 2d July, 1825, be ratified and confirmed; and that the
trustee apply the proceeds accordingly, with a due proportion of
interest, that has been or may be received, towards the payment
of such of the said claims as may remain due and unpaid after the
57 payment of the sum now in bank; for the payment of * which
to the said claimant's solicitor, the register is hereby directed
to draw a check.

The trustee, Brewer, appealed from the order of the 29th of
August, 1825; and under the name of the case of Nicholas Brewer,
v. Charles W. Hanson, and others, on the 2d of July, 1828, the
order was affirmed.

STRIKE'S CASE.

CREDITORS' SUIT TO VACATE DEEDS.—MESNE PROFITS.—COMPENSATION FOR
IMPROVEMENTS.—PARTIES TO CREDITORS' SUIT.—-PROOF OF CLAIMS.—
LIMITATIONS.—CHANCERY PRACTICE.

On a bill by a creditor, on its being shewn, that certain conveyances, by the
debtor defendant to the other defendant, were executed for the purpose
of defrauding the creditors of the debtor defendant, and without bona
fide consideration; they were by decree declared to be void, as against
the complainant, and the property ordered to be sold, (a)

It was held, that, by such a decree, the plaintiff's claim must be taken to
have been established; that the property directed to be sold was to be
dealt with in that suit as if those annulled deeds had never existed:
that the proceeds of sale must be brought into Court; and that a reser-
vation of "all equities as to the distribution of the proceeds of sale, are

(a) As to creditors' suits generally, see Hammond v. Hammond, 2 Bland,
316.

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Brantly's annotated Bland's Reports, Chancery Court 1809-1832
Volume 198, Page 50   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives