WILLIAM SON v. WILSON.—1 BLAND. 415
On the petition and representation of the receiver John Scott.

BLAND, C., 21st May. 1827.—It was and still is my understand-
ing and intention to allow to John Scott as receiver no commis-
sion on any sums for the receipt and disbursement of which a
commission had been allowed to the late receiver Jacob Schley;
it being my determination, if possible, uot to charge the estate
with double commissions. I had presumed that the late receiver's
account comprehended the whole estate, and that the commissions
had been computed and allowed accordingly; but, should that not
be the case, then the receiver John Scott will be allowed the usual
commissions on all sums on which no commission had been previ-
ously charged and allowed.

After which the case was again brought before the Court on the
report of Anna B. Schley, John J. Mayer and Henry Schroeder,
Jun'r, administrators of Jacob Schley, deceased, made in pursuance
of the order of the fourth of May last: and the receipt of John
Scott the receiver therewith filed.

BLAND, C., 1st June, 1827.—Ordered, that the said admin-
istrators bring into this Court the sum of seven thousand four
hundred and two dollars and fifty-one cents, the balance remaining
in their hands after deducting the commissions and fees as set
forth in their said report; which sum the register is hereby directed
to deposit in the Farmers Bank of Mainland in the usual manner,
to the ciedit of this case. And it is further ordered, that the
bond given by the late Jacob Schley, as receiver, be delivered up
to the * administrators to be cancelled; and that they with
the sureties in the said bond, be finally discharged: Provided 440
that a copy of the said report and of this order be served on the
present receiver, on or before the twelfth day of this month. Un-
less good cause to the contrary be shewn during and before the
close of the next July Term by the said receiver, or by the parties
to this case, or by some one interested therein.

Afterwards on the 19th April, 1828, copies having been served
as required, and no cause shewn, the bond of the late receiver was
ordered to be delivered up, and his administrators were dis-
charged. This case still remained open, and the whole of the funds
of the firm not having been finally disposed of, four other creditors
filed the vouchers of their claims in the Chancery office after the day
limited by the orders of the 21st July and the 17th of November, 1826,
and prayed to be allowed to come in for a due proportion. The au-
ditor reported a statement of their claims as usual, at the request
of the claimants; and also made several other reports at the in-
stance of creditors who had supplied the want of proof or re-