BUT NOT PROPER TO BE INCORPORATED.
151
See in Harris's Entries, (1 vol. 172,) the form of
a declaration by and against such an executor;
but the law is considered to be altered by the testamentary law, which
declares, (in the 5th chapter,
S. 6,) that in case any executor, &c. shall die before the estate
shall be fully administered, letters of
administration de bonis non shall be granted to the person entitled,
and that in no case shall the executor
of an executor be entitled as executor to administration de bonis non.
CHAP. 14. What process shall be awarded against
him that is indicted of felony.
See as to this statute 4 Bl. Com. 314, and 2 Hale
194. It has been observed in the note on the statute
of 1 Hen. 5, Ch. 5, that in determining that the addition of the estate,
&c. was necessary in the
indictment then in question. A reference was made by one of the judges,
to several acts of assembly,
in which the process of outlawry was mentioned. These acts were 1737,
Ch. 2, and 1744, Ch.
20, and there were other proceedings in the province to the same effect.
In 1666, an act was passed
concerning outlawries, the provisions of which cannot be known, as it was
not recorded. In 1705,
an act was passed for the outlawry of R. Clarke, who was charged with treason,
declaring, that
unless he should surrender himself within twenty days, he should forfeit
his goods and chattels, lands
and tenements, as an outlawed person, any want of process, or any other
legal proceeding in anywise
notwithstanding.
The proceedings against a certain R. H. in 1658, will
shew more particularly the extention of
this statute. He had been indicted for bigamy, and an inquest was
taken before the coroner of St.
Mary's county, finding, that according to evidence, the prisoner R. H.
did fly for fear of coming to
trial for his fact committed. It was moved to the court by the attorney-general,
whether or not
R. H. should be called at this court to outlawry, or should have
respite to be called at five several
courts, and it was ordered that he should be called at five several courts.
It will be observed, that
the declaration of rights provides in the 21st section, that no free man
ought to be taken or imprisoned,
or disseised of his freehold, liberties or privileges, or outlawed or exiled,
but by the judgment
of his peers, or by the law of the land; which was also a part of Magna
Charta.
In the act for security of the government, October 1777,
Ch. 20, directions were given in the
28th section, as to the manner in which persons indicted for high treason
might be outlawed, which
manner was pursued as to several persons in the general court at May term
1780, and afterwards.
It was different from the one used under this statute, being by calling
once in the general court, and
twice in the county court, from which the capias was returned.
From the terms of that act, relating
only to outlawries for treason, from its silence as to other offences,
and from there being no case in
the provincial records except that of R. H. which has been mentioned, it
is considered that this statute
is not necessary or proper to be incorporated, &c.
Statutum de stapulis, Anno 27, Edw. 3, Stat. 2.
This statute contained 28 chapters, which remain
in the law French.
As to those concerning the statute staple, see the note
on the statutes of Acton Burnel, 11 Edw. 1.
Ordinatio de feodis majorum et constabulorum stapule, 27 Edw.
3.
Same.
|
 |