Art. 21. That in all criminal prosecutions, every man hath
a right to be informed of the accusation against him; to have
a copy of the Indictment, or Charge in due time (if required)
to prepare for his defence; to be allowed counsel; to be con-
fronted with the witnesses against him; to have process for
his witnesses; to examine the witnesses for and against him
on oath; and to a speedy trial by an impartial jury, without
whose unanimous consent he ought not to be found guilty.

Ford vs. State, 12 Md., 514. Davis vs. State, 39 Md., 355. State vs.
Glenn, 54 Md., 572. John vs. State, 55 Md., 350. Danner vs. State, 89
Md., 225. Lancaster vs. State, 90 Md., 213. Guy vs. State, 96 Md., 694.

Art. 22. That no man ought to be compelled to give evi-
dence against himself in a criminal case.

Day vs. State, 7 Gill, 321. Broadbent vs. State, 7 Md., 416. Blum vs.
State, 94 Md., 381-2.

Art. 23. That no man ought to be taken or imprisoned or
disseized of his freehold, liberties or privileges, or outlawed,
or exiled, or in any manner destroyed, or deprived of his life,
liberty or property, bat by the judgment of his peers, or by
the Law of the Land.

Wright vs. Wright, 2 Md., 429. Mayor, &c., Baltimore vs. Horn,
25 Md., 206. Davis vs. Helbig, 27 Md., 462. Both vs. House of Refuge,
31 Md., 329. Grove vs. Todd, 41 Md., 633. Singer vs. State, 72 Md.,
464. Ulman vs. M. & O. C. Baltimore, 72 Md., 587-609. Scharf vs.
Tasker, 73 Md., 378. Danner vs. State, 89 Md., 225. Sprigg vs. Garrett
Park, 89 Md., 406. State vs. Broadhurst, 89 Md., 565. State vs. Know-
der, 90 Md., 653. Lancaster vs. State, 90 Md., 213. Lurman vs. Hitchens,
90 Md., 17. Board of Police, Balto. City.. vs. Wagner, 93 Md., 182.
Wagner vs. Upshur, 95 Md., 519. Savings Bank vs. Wicks, 103 Md.
State vs. Gurry, 121 Md.

Art. 24. That slavery shall not be re-established in this
State; but, having been abolished, under the policy and au-
thority of the United States, compensation, in consideration
thereof, is due from the United States.

Art. 25. That excessive bail ought not to be required, nor
excessive fines imposed, nor cruel or unusual punishment in-
flicted by the Courts of Law.
Mitchell vs. State, 82 Md., 527, 532.

Art. 26. That all warrants, without oath or affirmation, to
search suspected places, or to seize any person or property,
are grievous and oppressive; and all general warrants to
search suspected places, or to apprehend suspected persons,
without naming or describing the place, or the person in spe-
cial, are illegal, and ought not to be granted.
Blum vs. State, 94 Md., 382.

Art. 27. That no conviction shall work corruption of blood
or forfeiture of estate.

Art. 28. That a well regulated Militia is the proper and
natural defence of a free government.