Volume 107, Page 1999 View pdf image (33K) |
REPORT. The undersigned, a minority of the committee on Regis- tration, to which was referred sundry memorials asking the removal of the constitutional disabilities in relation to the elective franchise beg Ieave to dissent from the position as- sumed by the majority, and to urge upon the Home the ne- cesity of taking such action as will speedily remove the dis- qualifications under which a large majority of our people are laboring. The disqualifying provisions of our constitution, if imposed upon the people as punishments, would even un- der the decision of our Court of Appeals, be clearly illegal and void. Believing, as we do, that the deprivation of the right of suffrage is the severest punishment that can he in- flicted upon the citizens, and that the visiting of, such a pen- alty for acts done, which were not criminal at the time the offences were committed, is contrary to the spirit of free in- stitutions, and repugnant to the Bill of Rights of Maryland, and the constitution of the United States; therefore in our and not punitive in their character. These odious disabilities therefore in our opinion, those provisions in order to have the least shadow of validity, must be regarded us preventive in the operation. were imposed in the midst of a sanguinary strife, when pas- sion had usurped the dominion of reason; when the barriers of the Constitution were overleaped under the please of preserv- ing the Government; but now all danger has passed; the Southern peope have expressed an almost unanimous desire to return to their allegiance; many of their chosen leaders |
||||
Volume 107, Page 1999 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.