Volume 107, Page 1411 View pdf image (33K) |
31 4th: A. We did not enter any person disqualified or disloyal who did not apply. 5th. Waived. 6th: A. We did to the best of our knowledge. 7th: : A. I think we did. To the best of my knowledge there was no case but where we entered the reason. 8th. If a man declined to take the oath after appealing before you, how did you enter him? A. We entered him as a disqualified voter. 9th and 10th. Same as propounded to John L. Porter. A. When there were witnesses, we so entered it; where it was known to ourselves, we entered it as "known to the board." ' ' 10th: A. The law required us to enter them qualified or disqual- ified, as we were satisfied. 11th. Were witnesses by whom the disqualifying acts were proved always sworn by the board? A. The witnesses before us were always sworn. 12th. Did you enter the witness on your list who was not sworn? A. There was one entered as a witness through mistake that was not sworn, but was corrected afterwards. 13th. When a member of the board was the witness, was he sworn? A. He was not sworn as witness, but was sworn to dis- charge his duty. 14th. Did you notify applicants of charges made against them, and give them opportunity to be confronted with the witnesses against them, for the purpose of cross-examina- tion ? A. That we did in some cases, but the last days, two of us being sick, we could not attend to that business. loth. Did you notify Wm. W. Wise of any charge pre- ferred against him ? A. We did not. 11th. Who testified against him? A. The book-will show. I don't recollect now. |
||||
Volume 107, Page 1411 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.