24
VOTES and PROCEEDINGS, November, 1796.
RESOLVED, That the treasurer of the western shore
pay unto Daniel Bussard, of Frederick
county, or his order, the sum of twenty-eight pounds four shillings
and seven-pence halfpenny
current money, it being the amount of costs laid out and expended by
the said Daniel Bussard, as
defendant in a suit brought by the state of Maryland in the general
court for the western shore
against the said Daniel Bussard, in which the state was nonsuit.
By order,
Z. HUGHES, clk.
Which was read.
Mr. Montgomery, from the committee, brings in and
delivers to Mr. Speaker the following report:
THE committee to whom was referred the petition
of Alexander Rigdon, of Harford county,
report, that they have taken the same into consideration, and find
the facts therein stated to be
true, and are of opinion that the petitioner ought not to be precluded
from having the money by
him paid into the treasury upon his bond applied to the payment of
the certificate of the tract of
land called Rigdon's Hardship, it being the residue of the land by
him purchased of the intendant,
and that the circumstance of his account bring closed through mistake
in the treasury books, ought
not to operate against him; therefore,
RESOLVED, That the account of the said Alexander
Rigdon be opened in the treasurer's books,
and that the money therein placed to his credit be applied to the certificate
of the tract of land
called Rigdon's Hardship, and that the same proceedings be had upon
the said certificate in the
several offices as if the said account had not been closed.
By order,
J. HARWOOD, clk.
Which was read.
A petition from sundry inhabitants of Dorchester
county, praying that a public ferry may be established
from the town of Cambridge to the Talbot shore, was preferred, read,
and referred to Mr.
Goldsborough, Mr. Sherwood, Mr. Pattison, Mr. Johnson and Mr. Robins,
to consider and report
thereon.
A petition from Lucy Jenings, widow of Richard Jenings,
an alien, praying the right of the
state may be relinquished to certain lands purchased by her deceased
husband, was preferred, read,
and referred to Mr. Brother, Mr. Shriver and Mr. Oneale, to consider
and report thereon.
Mr. David Luckett, a delegate returned for Montgomery
county, appeared, and, after qualifying
in the mode prescribed by the constitution and form of government,
and taking the oath to support
the constitution of the United States, took his seat in the house.
On the second reading the report on the petition
of Valentine Lynn, the question was put, That
the resolution therein contained be struck out? Resolved in the
affirmative.
On motion, the question was put, That the following
be received as an amendment? viz. RESOLVED,
That the treasurer of the western shore pay to Valentine Lynn the sum
of £. 68 13 1 current
money, it being the amount of depreciation due him as a soldier in
the first Maryland regiment,
as ascertained by the auditor-general? Resolved in the affirmative,
and sent to the senate by the clerk.
Whereas a resolution passed the general assembly
of Maryland, at their session 1794, requesting
the honourable the chancellor of Maryland, and four other gentlemen,
to frame and prepare, for the
consideration of the legislature, a code of testamentary laws:
And whereas the object of the said resolution
has not been attained: And whereas the evils resulting from the
want of such a code are
every day increasing, and this general assembly being desirous to carry
into effect some general system
upon this subject during their present session; wherefore, RESOLVED,
That Alexander Contee Hanson,
chancellor of Maryland, be requested to lay before this general assembly,
for their consideration,
such a system of testamentary laws, and plan of administration thereof,
as in his judgment shall appear
most just, wise and expedient.
RESOLVED, That the general assembly will guaranty
to the chancellor a liberal and competent
allowance for his time, talents and labour, devoted to carrying into
effect the foregoing resolution.
Sent to the senate by the clerk.
Mr. Charles Ridgely, of William, a delegate returned
for Baltimore county, appeared, and after
qualifying in the mode prescribed by the constitution and form of government,
and taking the oath
to support the constitution of the United States, took his seat in
the house.
The bill for erecting a new bridge and amending
the causeways over Dividing creek, between the
counties of Somerset and Worcester, was read the second time, and the
question put, That the said
bill do pass? The yeas and nays being required, appeared as follow:
A F F I
R M A T
I V E.
Messieurs
W. Thomas,
Hopewell,
Neale,
Barroll,
Buchanan,
Ridout,
J. C. Thomas,
Sprigg, |
Chapman,
Digges,
Ridgely,
Harwood,
Lamdin,
Goldsborough,
Pattison, |
Miller,
Wallace,
Savin,
Duckett,
Baker,
Key,
Butcher, |
C. Frazier,
Whittington,
Robins,
Corbin,
Wilson,
Brother,
Quynn, jun. |
Shriver,
Prall,
Bennett,
Young,
McMechen,
Bowles,
McClain, |
Douglass,
Reintzel,
Swearingen,
Oneale,
Luckett,
J. C. Beatty,
Johnson. |
|
N E G A
T I V E.
Messieurs
Spencer,
Bourne, |
Merryman,
Sherwood, |
Jones,
Handy, |
Wilkins,
Brown, |
Jarrett,
Cellar, |
Tomlinson.
|
11.
|
So it was resolved in the affirmative.
Sent to the senate by the clerk.
The following message being prepared, was sent to the
senate by the clerk.
|
![clear space](../../../images/clear.gif) |