|
(There was no response.)
The Clerk will record the vote.
There being 100 votes in the affirmative
and 1 in the negative, the motion is carried
and the amendment is adopted.
The question now arises on the adoption
of the amendment recommended by the
Committee on Style to delete the word
"such" from line 4 on page 2 of section
8.02.
A vote in favor of the recommendation
of the Committee on Style would delete the
word "such"; a vote against the recom-
mendation of the Committee on Style and
it would restore the word "such".
Cast your vote.
Has every delegate voted? Does any
delegate desire to change his vote?
(There was no response.)
There being 11 votes in the affirmative
and 80 in the negative, the motion is lost
and the amendment is rejected.
The question now arises on the adoption
of the amendment by the Committee on
Style to section 8.02 to insert the word
"over" as the first word on line 7 on page
2, to delete the word "the" in the same
line and substitute the word "their" and to
delete the word "thereof" in the same line.
Is there any discussion?
(There was no response.)
Are you ready for the question?
Delegate Case.
DELEGATE CASE: So that the sen-
tence would read "over the expenditure of
their funds thereof"?
THE PRESIDENT: No, "thereof" would
be out.
DELEGATE CASE: Very well.
THE PRESIDENT: Are you ready for
the question?
(Call for the question.)
The question arises on the adoption of
the amendment proposed by the Committee
on Style to insert as the first word in line
7 the word "over", to delete from the same
line the word "the", and substitute the
word "their", and to delete from the same
line the word "thereof".
A vote Aye is a vote in favor of the
amendment; a vote No is a vote against.
|
Cast your vote.
Has every delegate voted? Does any dele-
gate desire to change his vote?
(There was no response.)
The Clerk will record the vote.
There being 98 votes in the affirmative
and 2 in the negative, the motion is carried
and the amendment is adopted.
The question arises on the adoption of
the recommendation of the Committee on
Style to amendment section 8.02 by strik-
ing all of line 8 on page 2.
Is there any discussion?
(There was no response.)
Are you ready for the question?
(Call for the question.)
The question arises on the adoption of
the amendment recommended by the Com-
mittee on Style to delete all of line 8 on
page 2.
A vote Aye is a vote in favor of the
recommendation of the Committee, and
would delete the line; a vote No is a vote
against and would restore the line.
Cast your votes.
Have all delegates voted? Does any dele-
gate desire to change his vote?
(There was no response.)
The Clerk will record the vote.
There being 21 votes in the affirmative
and 78 in the negative, the motion is lost
and the amendment is rejected.
Are there any further amendments to
section 8.01 or section 8.02?
Delegate Sybert.
DELEGATE SYBERT: Mr. Chairman,
does that not leave the anomolous result
of having the word "such" in line 4 that
we now do not need in view of the rejection
of the last amendment.
THE PRESIDENT: I do not think so.
The section as now amended would read
as follows: This is the sentence beginning
in line 3: "These boards may be granted
by the General Assembly by law such ad-
ditional powers of supervision, direction,
and control of their respective institutions
and over the expenditure of their funds as
the General Assembly may deem to be
appropriate."
Delegate Sybert.
|
