|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21 |
THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Byrnes.
Delegate Bothe has only one minute left.
There are two people with questions, including yours.
DELEGATE BYRNES: Would you leave to judicial
development the question of whether or not this would
extend to the indirect results of illegal searches and
seizures, the Wong Sun doctrine, to say it to you very
quickly?
THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Bothe.
DELEGATE BOTHE: Ag-eat deal of this would
have to be left to judicial interpretation. It is only a
question, as the fourth amendment has always been,
what is an illegal and unreasonable search?
This amendment does not propose to go into all
that detail. It would have to be a judicial question.
THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Hargrove.
DELEGATE HARGROVE: Is it your intention in this
amendment to give to private citizens more of a right to
invade the privacy than to the State in a civil case?
! DELEGATE BOTHE: Are you speaking now of tbc a.-t
that a .ri-vto citizen would probably not be able to obt - '
) ; |