|
1
2 3 4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17 i
18 j
19
£0
21 |
THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Case.
UELKGATE CASE: Delegate Morgan, I am not
disagreeing with the idea, I think it is a good one. I
think the sections must be read together and when they are,
they present somewhat a confused picture. I am wondering whether in line 36 of Section 4.1
your work product would be hurt by striking out the words,
"by law" so that it would read "all functions, powers, etc.,
of the State Government shall be prescribed and allocated
among and within not more than 20 principal departments."
Isn't what you are really driving at there that
there shall be 20 principal departments and not the procedure
by which the departments come into being and yet, the words
"by law" are sufficiently confusing to raise this point.
If you struck the words "by law" out of Section
4.18, I think the dilemma might be resolved.
THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Morgan.
DELEGATE MORGAN: Mr. President, I think really
the only way you could strike "by law" out of Section 4.18
would also be to strike out the word "shall be prescribed"
and certainly there is no intention to have the Governor |