1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
16
17
18
19
20
21

suitable for a constitution. I ask you today, who is
to judge what is suitable for a constitution? Each one
of us as individuals have to decide that. It is not
a question of law per se. Many of these things are options 1,
one way or the other. It is a question of value judgments.
Where do you place your sense of value?
Is it because of the number of neople who are
affected? I have to disagree with my good friend,
Delegate Smith, on this when he says that it is too par-
ticularized. All of us are consumers, I submit. We were
talking bubefore special groups, farmers, lumbermen,
miners. We are all consumers. There is no reference
to a particular religion or economic status. I disagree
somewhat with Delegate Koger. This protects the rich
as well as the poor man. I make reference to Delegate
Case's remarks when he said many, many people were
swindled by savings and loan scandals. People had hundreds
of thousands of dollars, not just the poor man. Would it
be better for us to spell it out, paragraph by paragraph,
ten or twelve pages? We do not need that. We need a
clear mandate to the legislature that we believe this