1
2
3
4
5
e
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
16
19
20
21

making power, the courts may be administered with r> suc"i
limitations and suggestio"" as the court in its wi"<losr
provides by rule.
There may be some apparent reason that the
legislature at the time it adds judges to this court may
have ideas as to how the divisions may sit or operate, wb
might not subsequently appear to the court to be impiemen
by rule. To me that is inconceivable.
Furthermore, the power of the legislature to
prescribe at the time it expanded the manpower of that
court as to how these divisions might operate could, I
respectfully suggest, interfere and disrupt the orderly
housekeeping, for want of a better word, of the overall
court concept, and of course, particularly at this expandab
court level of the intermediate appellate court, which this
majority report of the Judicial Committee contemplates
must be expanded to take care of an increasing caseload at
that level.
We therefore feel that adoption of this amend-
ment is inconsistent with the recommended procedures
in other jurisdictions, especially the appellate level, and