|
|
13,670
|
|
1
|
question of relating that back to Section 2, Article 2,
|
|
2
|
is one which I would not address myself to.
|
|
3
|
We have in Section 2.06 as it came to us from
|
|
4
|
the Convention.
|
|
5
|
Now, I presume they may be seeking to cover the
|
|
6
|
same thing, but it is a substantive question.
|
|
7
|
THE PRESIDENT: Delegate Grant, I would take
|
|
8
|
it the question is one of substance rather than style.
|
|
9
|
DELEGATE GRANT: I believe it to be one of
|
|
10
|
substance, Mr. Chairman, but in view of the fact that you
|
|
11
|
have one definition in one place and apparently either
|
|
12
|
another definition or a definition of the definition that
|
|
13
|
is on page 6, you have to almost consider both of them at
|
|
14
|
this time to see if it would be desirable to make a change
|
|
15
|
on page 6 .
|
|
16
|
THE PRESIDENT: I am only saying I don't think
|
|
17
|
the question is one properly addressed to Delegate Penni-
|
|
18
|
man. It may be a proper question.
|
|
19
|
Delegate Koss, did you understand the question
|
|
20
|
that was raised, or perhaps this is more a matter of the
|
|
21
|
schedule of legislation than it is of Article 2.
|