1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
IQ
17
18
19
20
21 |
discretion as to whether or not the destruction has
occurred. It seems to me the better language would be to
permit the Governor to act only if the destruction has in
fact occurred, and not where there is any uncertainty as
to whether or not it has occurred.
THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Gallagher, in view
of the comments do you stand on your language?
DELEGATE GALLAGHER: Mr. Chairman, I do not
stand on the language. I think the same object can be
accomplished both in Mr. Hardwicke's verb and my
verb. I am happy to give him the benefit of the verb.
THE CHAIRMAN: Will the seconder accept the
modification to strike the words "may have" in line four
and substitute the word "have"?
DELEGATE BARRICK: Yes, I accept it. That
was my original wording.
THE CHAIRMAN: The motion as modified, the
words "may have" in line four are stricken and the
word "have" is inserted.
Is there any further discussion? Are you ready
for the question? |
