|
|
11,729
|
|
1
|
will be that you will come as close to breaking out and
|
|
2
|
killing what I thought ought to be destroyed and that is a
|
|
3
|
bonanza or a break for the speculator, but you don't want
|
|
4
|
to in attempting to kill what he is doing, kill the farmers
|
|
5
|
in Maryland and therefore my view is that we ought to vote
|
|
6
|
against the two amendments, first the Barrick amendment,
|
|
7
|
secondly we ought to vote against the Hanson amendment.
|
|
8
|
What the committee has got in here comes as close,
|
|
9
|
with the help of the Legislature and the State Bureau of
|
|
10
|
Assessments which is going to administer this, to getting
|
|
11
|
at what is a proper classification.
|
|
12
|
The bona fide farmer will be protected but he
|
|
13
|
won't he protected just by somebody calling him a farmer.
|
|
14
|
He will have to go through a whole lot to prove it.
|
|
15
|
THE PRESIDENT: Delegate Mitchell.
|
|
16
|
DELEGATE MITCHELL: Cannot the General Assembly
|
|
17
|
just as easily define "bona fide farmer" as it can
|
|
18
|
"agricultural property"?
|
|
19
|
THL PRESIDENT: Delegate Sherbow.
|
|
20
|
DELEGATE SHERBOW: It can and it should and that
|
|
21
|
is what we are saying, but if you put "bona fide farmer" in
|