|
|
10,914
|
|
1
|
to pay.
|
|
2
|
As a former people's counsel, I do recognize
|
|
3
|
the ability of public utilities to increase their rates
|
|
4
|
to take care of increased expenditures, and I would believe
|
|
5
|
the B&0 would not be averse to taking this road to economic
|
|
6
|
security.
|
|
7
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Clagett.
|
|
8
|
DELEGATE CLAGETT: By way of caption on what
|
|
9
|
we have said, I gather the Committee then made no background
|
|
10
|
study to determine whether if this exemption was lost
|
|
11
|
by the B&0 it would be or would not be able to meet the
|
|
12
|
obligation to tax?
|
|
13
|
DELEGATE GALLAGHER: No, sir, we did not feel that
|
|
14
|
was a proper matter of inquiry.
|
|
15
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Case.
|
|
16
|
DELEGATE CASE: Maybe we can get at it this
|
|
17
|
way, Mr. Chairman.
|
|
18
|
Succinctly, would the B&0 Railroad like to see
|
|
19
|
this provision in the constitution or out of the constitution?
|
|
20
|
DELEGATE CALLAGHER: Mr. Case, I an not
|
|
21
|
provided with a crystal ball, but if I were I would suspect
|