|
|
10,867
|
|
1
|
confer original jurisdiction on it, but we decided there
|
|
2
|
were so many problems in that we didn't want to get into
|
|
3
|
Federal-State conflicts. We didn't feel that it would
|
|
4
|
be wise to attempt to do that. Consequently, I would
|
|
5
|
suspect that you could go either to the state courts or to
|
|
6
|
the Federal courts for relief -- probably the Federal
|
|
7
|
courts are the best avenue of relief for Congressional
|
|
8
|
Districts. At least they are the most traveled.
|
|
9
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Boyer.
|
|
10
|
DELEGATE BOYER: Delegate Gallagher, the Ohio
|
|
11
|
case to which you referred was probably Lucas v. Rhodes, was
|
|
12
|
it not, in the Supreme Court?
|
|
13
|
DELEGATE GALLAGHER: Yes. sir.
|
|
14
|
DELEGATE BOYER: Which was decided, I believe,
|
|
15
|
December 13 -- just recently.
|
|
16
|
DELEGATE GALLAGHER: That is correct.
|
|
17
|
DELEGATE BOYER: Could you tell us, please,
|
|
18
|
what the reasoning of the court was in striking down the
|
|
19
|
unofficial guesstimate used by the Ohio Legislature in
|
|
20
|
redistricting?
|
|
21
|
DELEGATE GALLAGHER: I will to the best of my
|