|
|
10,866
|
|
1
|
General Assembly could fail to exercise its responsibility
|
|
2
|
in a constitutional fashion, and that a set of circum-
|
|
S
|
stances might arise where a Federal District Court would
|
|
4
|
be forced, because of the exigencies of time, to attempt
|
|
5
|
the redistricting itself, but I would hope that this would
|
|
6
|
go a long way towards thrusting the ultimate responsibility
|
|
7
|
on the General Assembly.
|
|
8
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Marion.
|
|
9
|
DELEGATE GALLAGHER: I might say that within two
|
|
10
|
years after the Westbury v. Sanders case. 27 states acted
|
|
11
|
to redistrict their Congressional areas virtually voluntarily.
|
|
12
|
Maryland was only one of four which found that its ultimate
|
|
13
|
discharge of responsibility had to be vested in the courts
|
|
14
|
rather than on the General Assembly.
|
|
15
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Marion.
|
|
16
|
DELEGATE MARION: But there is no authority in
|
|
17
|
thisthis section for the Court of Appeals of Maryland to
|
|
18
|
assume the responsibility if the Legislature fails to
|
|
19
|
act, would that be correct?
|
|
20
|
DELEGATE GALLAGHER: That is correct. We
|
|
21
|
toyed with the idea of having the Court of Appeals do this,
|