|
|
10,852
|
|
|
1
|
With this in mind, considering the fact that three
|
|
|
2
|
attempted congressional redistricting laws, 1961, '63, and
|
|
|
5
|
'65, never saw the light of day, and that Maryland turned
|
|
|
4
|
out to be one of the four states of the Union which had
|
|
|
5
|
ultimately to resort to the courts in order to accomplish
|
|
|
6
|
congressional redistricting, it was thought that we should
|
|
|
7
|
attempt within the limits possible to set up some standards
|
|
|
8
|
and procedure.
|
|
|
9
|
At the outset, I should say that we recognize
|
|
|
10
|
that Congress has the right at any time to pass laws
|
|
|
11
|
pertaining to the same areas which the proposal you have
|
|
|
12
|
before you refers to which, in effect, would preempt Maryland
|
|
|
13
|
on any Constitutional or statutory provisions, so that
|
|
|
14
|
we do, in suggesting to you the fact that there be
|
|
|
15
|
congressional districting constitutional law in Maryland,
|
|
|
16
|
we do run the risk of having the area preempted. However,
|
|
|
17
|
that risk does not seem too great on the b.asis of what has
|
|
|
18
|
occurred in recent times.
|
|
|
19
|
The Federal Congress, since 1929, has really
|
|
|
20
|
not had any standards of any genuine application with
|
|
|
21
|
respect to congressional districts. Prior to that time,
|
|