|
|
10,851
|
|
1
|
Even though, it was not the intention of the
|
|
2
|
Committee on the Legislative Branch originally to include
|
|
3
|
a section on congressional redistricting, the events
|
|
4
|
which took place in the Congress the day before we
|
|
5
|
considered the amendment which was proposed here, plus a
|
|
6
|
further study of the history of Maryland and of congressiona:
|
|
7
|
attempts generally to set up standards has prompted the
|
|
8
|
Committee on the Legislative Branch to reconsider its
|
|
9
|
earlier opinion and to come forth with the suggestion
|
|
10
|
which you have before you.
|
|
11
|
I think! Maryland's history with respect to
|
|
12
|
congressional redistricting can be best summarized in a
|
|
13
|
capsule sentence which appears in a pamphlet called
|
|
14
|
"Representation and Apportionment" published by the
|
|
15
|
Congressional Quarterly Service in August of 1966. Maryland
|
|
16
|
was unique enough to prompt a separate article in this
|
|
17
|
particular publication entitled "Redistricting in Maryland",
|
|
18
|
and the lead sentence I think is what would interest us:
|
|
19
|
"Congressional redistricting never easily accomplished provec
|
|
20
|
more difficult in Maryland than in any other state in the
|
|
21
|
country in the 1960's."
|