|
|
10,827
|
|
1
|
clearly understood by the delegates.
|
|
2
|
The first point is that this provision and this
|
|
3
|
recommendation poses absolutely no threat to administrative
|
|
4
|
agencies or administrative law. These agencies have been
|
|
5
|
delegated legislative, executive and judicial power.
|
|
6
|
They have proliferated over the past 40 to 50 years
|
|
7
|
all the time while this provision has been in the
|
|
8
|
constitution -- that is point number one.
|
|
9
|
Point number two, the necessity for keeping
|
|
10
|
this provision in the constitution has not been eliminated
|
|
11
|
because we simply provide in this constitution that the
|
|
12
|
executive power shall be vested in the governor, the judicial
|
|
13
|
power shall be vested in the courts, and the legislative
|
|
14
|
power shall be vested in the General Assembly.
|
|
15
|
That power has been vested in those groups under
|
|
16
|
prior constitutions, and we have had, at the same time,
|
|
17
|
this provision continuing in our constitution back to 1776.
|
|
18
|
This Committee proposal is absolutely necessary
|
|
19
|
if you want to prevent one thing, and one thing only, and
|
|
20
|
that is a delegation of legislative power to another branch
|
|
21
|
of the government -- not to an administrative agency.
|