|
|
10,793
|
|
1
|
whom there is no means provided.
|
|
2
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Bamberger.
|
|
3
|
DELEGATE BAMBERGER: I am bothered then by how
|
|
4
|
it would apply to any appointed officer because my recol-
|
|
5
|
lection of the executive article is that the governor has
|
|
6
|
the right to remove all of those appointed officials. If
|
|
7
|
that is so, then I just think we might be more specific
|
|
8
|
and really pin this where we want to pin this which is on
|
|
9
|
elected state officials.
|
|
10
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Grant.
|
|
11
|
DELEGATE GRANT: It does apply to appointed
|
|
12
|
officers, remember there is a dichotomy, the power of
|
|
13
|
appointment carries with it the power of removal if it is
|
|
14
|
an appointment for an indefinite term. If it is for a
|
|
15
|
definite term, then it does not carry the implied power
|
|
16
|
of removal. Then you get into the situation he serves
|
|
17
|
at the pleasure of the appointed official then he may be
|
|
18
|
removed whether his term is definite or indefinite. In
|
|
19
|
the executive article we provide that the heads of the
|
|
20
|
executive department shall serve at the pleasure of the
|
|
21
|
government. For those 20 people the power of removal is
already implied in the Constitution. However, were some
|