|
|
10,701
|
|
1
|
two suggestions to make. I don't know it would be
|
|
2
|
absolutely imperative to change the next section because
|
|
5
|
this would purely be providing for the convention, but,
|
|
4
|
in any event, should the change not be at the second
|
|
5
|
regular session but something like not later than at
|
|
6
|
the second regulat session --
|
|
7
|
DELEGATE JAMES: Something to that effect. I
|
|
8
|
am worried about this. I would have an election in the
|
|
9
|
fall, November, and the governor would have sixty days
|
|
10
|
to appoint his commission. It would be pressing things
|
|
11
|
rather hard to ask the commission to make all necessary
|
|
12
|
technical studies and pro vide a proper bill for the
|
|
13
|
calling of a convention to the General Assembly. You are
|
|
14
|
very familiar with all the problems involved in that.
|
|
15
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Would there be any objection
|
|
16
|
to considering the amendment of Delegate James that would
|
|
17
|
change the sentence beginning in line 18. Continuing
|
|
18
|
in line 19 so that instead of reading "at its next regular
|
|
19
|
session, "it would read at "not later than the second
|
|
20
|
regular session"? With the understanding that the amend-
|
|
21
|
ment will be printed and circulated and on your desk later.
|