10, 645

1

suspect as far as the general public is concerned. I

2

think that the public is going to be asked to take a

3

Constitution on balance. I am going to ask them to do

4

that. I think they should have through the constitutional

5

initiative process the right to change that part of the

6

Constitution that they may disagree with, to do it

7

directly and not through their representatives.

8

I think that the situation or the criteria

9

set up by Dr. Winslow make this very restrictive and I

10

don't see that this is very similar to the indirect

11

initiative that I was a co-sponsor on earlier in the

12

session.

13

For those reasons I would appreciate your

14

supporting this amendment.

15

THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Cardin.

16

DELEGATE CARDIN: Mr. Chairman, I would like

17

tospeak against this even though I am in favor of the

18

idea. The more I have studied it the more I realize

19

there are pit-falls.

20

First I would suggest that if this were so

21

great and so important a need the possibility of forty-six