|
|
10,627
|
|
1
|
to a geographic spread-, that not more than one- fourth
|
|
2
|
of the signers may come from any one county. This is
|
|
5
|
also twice as difficult for we have provided that not
|
|
4
|
more than half should come from one county.
|
|
5
|
I suggest that under this provision, neither
|
|
6
|
the ultra-liberal people in Baltimore County nor the ultra-
|
|
7
|
conservative people in Montgomery, or both of them combined,
|
|
8
|
could possibly produce enough signers.
|
|
9
|
These two congenial groups would, of necessity,
|
|
10
|
get at least two more counties to go along with them before
|
|
11
|
they could produce an amendment.
|
|
12
|
Now, the reason for this is stated rather
|
|
13
|
succinctly in an article which appeared in a metropolitan
|
|
14
|
newspaper not too far away on Sunday morning last which
|
|
15
|
reads :
|
|
16
|
"The difficulty of this method is intentional.
|
|
17
|
It is not desired by the sponsor that frequent amendments
|
|
18
|
should arise by petition. On the contrary, it is their
|
|
19
|
intent that amendment by the petition method should be most
|
|
20
|
infrequent, and occasioned only by the seeming impossibility
|
|
21
|
of getting the wanted change by either of the other two
|