|
|
10,325
|
|
1
|
will be able to continue under its existing procedure
|
|
2
|
and would give them no greater or lesser latitude than
|
|
5
|
they enjoy now.
|
|
4
|
DELEGATE CLARK: Delegate Bard.
|
|
5
|
DELEGATE BARD: In Section 7 , a new element,
|
|
6
|
first, knowing that most community colleges by present law
|
|
7
|
have to use the word "community" officially even though
|
|
8
|
they may sometimes be known as junior collegeswould you
|
|
9
|
mind eliminating all of line 44, this sounds a little like
|
|
10
|
Delegate Scanlan, "by whatever name they may hereafter be
|
|
11
|
known"? That seems so redundant. Would there be any ob-
|
|
12
|
jection to that?
|
|
13
|
DELEGATE CLARK: Delegate Wheatley.
|
|
14
|
DELEGATE WHEATLEY: I would say in this matter
|
|
15
|
it would be strictly an objection based on taking away
|
|
16
|
flexibility in cases — there has been a case in Baltimore
|
|
17
|
City. The name would be changed to some other institution.
|
|
18
|
That was the purpose in the second line.
|
|
19
|
DELEGATE CLARK: Delegate Bard.
|
|
20
|
DELEGATE BARD: In line 46 where it says "shall
|
|
21
|
be controlled by local boards in accordance with law" , in
|