|
|
10,241
|
|
1
|
speak on amendment 24?
|
|
2
|
DELEGATE GULLETT: In favor of it, very briefly.
|
|
3
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Very well. The Chair will permit
|
|
4
|
you to proceed.
|
|
5
|
DELEGATE GULLETT: I thinkthe time has come
|
|
6
|
when we should seriously reorient our thinking about the
|
|
7
|
conduct of public meetings and about allowing the record
|
|
8
|
to be made available for those who need to know.
|
|
9
|
All the records of the public meetings are open
|
|
10
|
here. It was very refreshing. I can think of no reason
|
|
11
|
why there should be a closed meeting except as to salary or
|
|
12
|
discharging an employee. There have been many instances
|
|
13
|
in the state of Maryland regarding this problem, and the
|
|
14
|
way the meetings are conducted in public. I think writing
|
|
15
|
this in the Constitution will serve as a clarion call to
|
|
16
|
those public officials who know that now is the time to
|
|
17
|
stop secrecy in public meetings.
|
|
16
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Areyou ready for the question?
|
|
19
|
Delegate Johnson, for what purpose do you rise?
|
|
20
|
DELEGATE JOHNSON: A parliamentary inquiry.
|
|
21
|
THE CHAIRMAN: State your inquiry.
|