|
|
10,130
|
|
1
|
care of the child support provision. I could be in error.
|
|
2
|
That is my impression.
|
|
3
|
THE CHAIRMAN: I think you are. The amend-
|
|
4
|
ment was made to section 3.8 because of the first
|
|
5
|
clause, because of the way section 3.8 read before the
|
|
6
|
amendment .
|
|
7
|
In other words, the provision, the amendment as
|
|
8
|
to imprisonment for non-support of children, was an amend-
|
|
9
|
ment of section 3.8 of Article III.
|
|
10
|
DELEGATE MACDONALD: I understand that fully,
|
|
11
|
Mr. Chairman, but if we had no section 3.8 of
|
|
12
|
Article III of the Constitution today, and the article
|
|
13
|
was complet — and the matter was completely
|
|
14
|
silent as far as the Constitution is concerned, I don't think
|
|
15
|
a man could be imprisoned in the State of Maryland for debt.
|
|
16
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate James.
|
|
17
|
DELEGATE JAMES: Mr. Chairman, I think I know
|
|
18
|
the legislative history of why the General Assembly amended
|
|
19
|
the law by way of Constitutional amendment.
|
|
20
|
My recollection is that problems used to occur
|
|
21
|
where separation agreements under which husbands would
|