|
|
10,129
|
|
1
|
you perhaps a more direct answer.
|
|
2
|
Section 38 of Article III of the present Constitu-
|
|
3
|
tion, in the first clause says: "No person shall be im-
|
|
4
|
prisoned for debt."
|
|
5
|
It was becuase of that provision that the
|
|
6
|
amendment of which you speak was necessary. If that had
|
|
7
|
not been in the Constitution the amendment would not have
|
|
8
|
been necessary. If this section 13 is omitted, this
|
|
9
|
Constitution will not have any similar provision that
|
|
10
|
a person shall not be imprisoned for debt.
|
|
11
|
Does that answer your inquiry, Delegate Mac-
|
|
12
|
donald?
|
|
13
|
DELEGATE MACDONALD: Not completely, Mr. Chair-
|
|
14
|
man.
|
|
15
|
I may be in error, but it has always been my
|
|
16
|
impression that the provision now in section 38, Article III
|
|
17
|
to which you have referred, namely, that no person shall be
|
|
18
|
imprisoned for debt, was simply declaratory of the common law,
|
|
19
|
and even if we didn't have that section in our Constitution
|
|
20
|
today, that prohibition would remain, and it was neces-
|
|
21
|
sary to include a provision in the Constitution to take
|