clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings and Debates of the 1864 Constitutional Convention
Volume 102, Volume 1, Debates 656   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

656

ther confirms my position if additional au-
thority can be required to fortify it.
But what of emancipation with State
compensation ? I am opposed to it. Now,
1 do not want to be misunderstood, or
quoted as saying that if the State eman-
cipates she ought not to compensate or
to secure payment to the slaveowners
for their property thus destroyed; hut I
repeat it, I am opposed to emancipation
based on State compensation. Who de-
mands this destruction of forty millions
worth of property ? Not the people of the
State cf their own fret will, and moved by
reasons which convince their judgment. It
is dune to satisfy the demands of those who
administer the Federal Government, and is
founded upon a supposed benefit which is
to accrue to that Government. It is done
to advance the National cause, to estab-
lish the National authority, and to restore
the Union more speedily. Mr. Lincoln
indicates this very theory in his message to
Congress of March 6th, 1862. Speaking of
emancipation, he says: " The Federal Gov-
ernment would find its highest interest in
such a measure as one of the most efficient
means of self-preservation. The leaders of
the existing insurrection entertain the hope

that this Government will ultimately be
forced to acknowledge the independence of
some part of the disaffected region, and
that all the slave States north of such part
will then say, ' The Union for which we
have struggled being already gone, we now
choose to go with the Southern section. '
To deprive them of this hope substantially
ends the rebellion; and the initiative of
emancipation completely deprives them of
it as to all the States initiating it. "
I cannot see the force of the reasoning
which leads the mind to this conclusion,
but conceding it for the purposes of the
argument, it follows that the Government
which is thereby so materially benefited by
the destruction of this property, should pay
for it.
I have before me the annexed table show-
ing what each county will receive, and what
each county will contribute towards paying
for the negroes made free, based upon State
compensation at the rate of three hundred
dollars a head. This shows that at this
rate of compensation it would involve the
State in a debt of $26, 156, 700, and then
only provide compensation for property
really worth, under the enforcement of the
laws which protect it, over $40, 000, 000.

FIGURES FOR TAX-PAYERS.

A Calculation of what each County will Receive and Pay if State Compensation is Car-
ried; based at $300 a head for all Stares, according to the Census of 1860.
 

No.

         

COUNTIES.

DEL.

ASSESSMENT.

RECEIVES.

PAYS.

BAL. RECE'D.

BAL'CE PAID.

Allegany Co

5

$8, 619, 522

$199, 800

$821, 292 42

 

$621, 492 43

Baltim're Co

7

20, 836, 209

954, 600

1, 985, 314 7)

 

1, 030, 714 71

Balto. City..

11

128 268, 669

665, 400

12, 216, 084 50

 

11, 550, 684 50

Carroll.......

4

9, 319, 461

234, 900

893, 702 14

 

658, 802 14

Cecil.........

4

7, 695, 511

285, 000

733, 250 04

 

448. 250 04

Frederick....

1

21, 361, 657

972, 900

2 035, 399 44

 

1, 062, 499 44

Harford.....

4

6, 569, 237

540, 000

'625, 935 67

 

85. 935 67

Washington

6

14, 061, 557

430, 500

1, 339, 842 45

 

909, 342 44

 

48

$216, 731, 829

14, 283, 100

$20, 650, 821 37

 

$16, 367, 721 37

Anne Arun'l

4

$6, 112, 450

$2, 199, 60°

$582, 411 60

$1, 617, 188 40

 

Calvert......

3

1, 723, 791

1, 382, 70°

164, 247 69

1, 218, 452 31

 

Caroline.....

3

1, 992, 290

221, 70°

189, 831 02

31, 868 98

 

Charles......

3

2, 774, 129

2. 895, 90°

264, 326 85

2, 631, 573 15

 

Dorchester..

4

4, 269, 880

1, 286, 900

406, 846 24

830, 053 76

 

Howard.....

3

3, 843, 784

858, 600

366, 246 61

492, 353 39

 

Kent..........

3

4, 802, 222

752, 700

457, 569 29

293, 130 81

 

Montgom'ry

3

4, 718 388

1, 626, 300

449, 581 35

1, 176, 718 65

 

P. George's.

4

7, 015, 750

3, 743, 700

668, 480 49

3, 075, 219 51

 

Qu'n Anne's

3

4, 878, 539

1, 252, 200

464, 840 99

787, 359 01

 

Somerset....

5

4, 185, 725

1, 526, 700

398, 827 74

1, 127, 872 29

 

St. Mary's...

3

2, 465, 409

1, 964, 700

234, 911 14

1, 729, 738 86

 

Talbot.......

3

4, 726, 241

1, 117. 500

450, 358 19

667, 141 81

 

Worcester...

4

4, 275, 686

1, 094, 400

407, 399 46

687, 000 54

 
 

90

$274, 516, 413

$26, 156, 700

$26, 156, 700

$16, 367, 721 3. j

$16, 367, 721 3?



 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings and Debates of the 1864 Constitutional Convention
Volume 102, Volume 1, Debates 656   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  August 16, 2024
Maryland State Archives