|
|
|
95
Mr. Clarke demanded the yeas and nays.
The demand being sustained, the yeas and nays were called
and appeared as follows:
AFFIRMATIVE.
Messrs.
Goldsborough, Pt. Galloway, Murray,
Abbott, Greene, Negley,
Annan, Harwood, Nyman,
Audoun, Hatch, Parker,
Baker, Hebb, Parran,
Barren, Henkle, Peter,
Belt, Hodson, Pugh,
Berry, of P. Geo. Hoffman, Purnell,
Billingsley, Hollyday, Robinette,
Blackiston, Hopkins, Russell,
Bond, Hopper, Sands,
Briscoe, Horsey, Schley,
Brown, Johnson, Scott,
Carter, Jones, of Cecil, Smith, of Dor.,
Chambers, Jones, of Sora., Smith, of Wor.,
Clarke, Keefer, Sneary,
Crawford, Kennard, Stirling,
Cunningham, King, Stockbridge,
Cushing, Larsh, Swope,
Dail, Lee, Sykes,
Daniel, Mace, Thomas,
Davis, of Charles, Marbury, Thruston,
Davis, of Wash., Markey, Todd,
Dellinger, McComas, Valliant,
Dennis, Mitchell, Wickard,
Earle, Miller, Wilmer,
Ecker, Morgan, Wooden—83.
Edelin. Mullikin,
NEGATIVE—None.
So the question was decided in the affirmative.
The question then recurred upon the adoption of the second
clause of said Article, to wit: "and they have at all times
the inalienable right to alter, reform or abolish their form of
government in such manner as they may deem expedient. "
Mr. Clarke demanded the yeas and nays.
The demand being sustained,
The yeas and nays were called and appeared as follows:
|
|
|
|
 |
