660

«r

So the question upon its adoption was decided in the
affirmative.

Mr. Chambers moved to suspend the rules to enable him to
submit an amendment:

The question being on the adoption of the motion,
Mr. Chambers demanded the yeas and nays;
The demand being sustained,

The yeas and nays were called, and appeared as follows:
AFFIRMATIVE.

Messrs. Davis, of Charles, Lee,

Billingsley, Dent, Marbury,

Blackiston, Duvall, Parran,

Bond, Hoffman, Peter,

Briscoe, Hollyday, Ridgely,

Brown, Horsey, Smith, of Dor.,

Chambers, Johnson, Sneary,

Clarke, Lansdale, Wilmer—25.

Crawford, Larsh,

NEGATIVE.

Messrs. Galloway, Pugh,
Goldsborough, P't Greene, Purnell,
Abbott, Hatch, Russell,
Annan, Hebb, Schlosser,
Audoun, Hopkins, Smith, of Carroll,
Baker, Hopper, - Smith, of Wor.,
Barron,. Keefer, Stirling.
Brooks, Kennard, Stockbridge,
Carter, Markey, Swope,
Cunningham, Mayhugh, Sykes,
Cushing, McComas, Todd,
Daniel, Mullikin, Valliant,
Davis, of Wash., Negley, ' Wickard,
Ecker, Parker, Wooden—42.
Farrow,
So the question upon its adoption was decided in the

negative.

I\lr. Davis, of Charles, moved to open the report to enable

him to move to strike ont the 2nd section;
Decided in the negative.
The report was then read the third time, and passed by yeas

and nays as follows:

AFFIRMATIVE.

Messrs. Greene, Purnell,
Goldsborough, P't Hatch, Ridgely,