Volume 102, Page 589 View pdf image (33K) |
589
The question being on the adoption of the amendment to
Mr. Swope demanded the yeas and nays.
The yeas and nays were called, and appeared as follows: Messrs. Gale, -Robinette, Annan, Hatch, Russell, Audoun, Hopper, Schlosser, Brown, Johnson, Smith, of Dor.., Carter, Keefer, Sneary, Cunningham, Markey, Swope, Davis, of Wash. Mayhugh, Sykes, Dellinger, McComas, Todd, Dennis, Nyman, Wickard—28. Ecker, Pugh, NEGATIVE. Messrs. Greene, Negley, Goldsborough, P't Hebb, Parker, Abbott, Hoffman, Parran, Billingsley, Hollyday, Peter, Blackiston, Hopkins, Purnell, Briscoe, Horsey, Ridgely, Chambers, Kennard, Sands, Cushing, King, Schley, Daniel, Lansdale, Smith, of Carroll, Dent, Larsh, Stirling, Duvall, Mitchell, Thomas, Edelen, Miller, Thruston, Farrow, Morgan, Wilmer, Galloway, Murray, Wooden—41.
So the question upon its adoption was decided in the
The question recurring upon the amendment submitted
Mr. Wooden demanded the yeas and nays,
The yeas and nays were called, and appeared as follows:
Messrs. Edelen, Morgan, |
||||
Volume 102, Page 589 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.