Volume 102, Page 522 View pdf image (33K) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
522
removal is not applied for with any view of delaying such Decided in the negative. Mr. Sands submitted the following amendment:
Sec. 10, line two, strike out the word "may, " and insert The question being on the adoption of the amendment, Mr. Todd demanded the yeas and nays, The demand being sustained, The yeas and nays were called, and appeared as follows: AFFIRMATIVE. Messrs. Hopkins, Nyman, Billingsley, Jones, of Som. Parran, Blackiston, King, Pugh, Brown, Lansdale, Robinette, Carter, Lee, Sands, Crawford, Markey, Smith, of Carroll, Davis, of Wash.. Mayhugh, Smith, of Wor., Dent, McComas, Stirling, Edelen, Mitchell, Wickard,
Galloway, Mullikin, Wooden—3 NEGATIVE. Messrs. Hopper, Purnell, Goldsborough, P't Keefer, Russell, Abbott, Kennard, Schley, Annan, Marbury, Schlosser, Audoun, Miller, Stockbridge, Cunningham, Murray, Swope, Daniel, Negley, Thruston,
Earle, Parker, Todd—24.
So the question upon its adoption was decided in the Mr. Sands submitted the following amendment:
Sec. 10, amend by inserting the words "by affidavit or
The question being on the adoption of the amendment,
|
![]() | |||
![]() | ||||
![]() |
Volume 102, Page 522 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.