|
|
338
The yeas and nays were called, and appeared as follows:
AFFIRMATIVE.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Messrs.
|
Dail,
|
Lee,
|
|
|
Abbott,
|
Davis, of Charles,
|
Marbury,
|
|
|
Berry, of P. Geo.
|
Duvall,
|
Mitchell,
|
|
|
Blackiston,
|
Edelen,
|
Miller,
|
|
|
Bond,
|
Harwood,
|
Morgan,
|
|
|
Briscoe,
|
Hollyday,
|
Parran,
|
|
|
Brown,
|
Horsey,
|
Peter,
|
|
|
Carter,
|
Jones, of Som.,
|
Smith, of Dor.
|
|
|
Chambers,
|
King,
|
Wilmer— 28.
|
|
|
Clarke,
|
Lansdale,
|
|
|
|
|
NEGATIVE.
|
|
|
|
Messrs.
|
Hebb,
|
Pugh,
|
|
|
Goldsborough, P't
|
Hopkins,
|
Purnell,
|
|
|
Annan,
|
Hopper,
|
Ridgely,
|
|
|
Audoun,
|
Jones, of Cecil,
|
Russell,
|
|
|
Barron,
|
Kennard,
|
Sneary,
|
|
|
Cunningham,
|
Larsh,
|
Stirling,
|
|
|
Cushing,
|
Markey,
|
Swope,
|
|
|
Dellinger,
|
McComas,
|
Sykes,
|
|
|
Earle,
|
Mullikin,
|
Thomas,
|
|
|
Ecker,
|
Murray,
|
Todd,
|
|
|
Farrow.
|
Negley,
|
Valliant,
|
|
|
Galloway,
|
Nyman,
|
Wooden— 37.
|
|
|
Hatch,
|
Parker,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So the Convention refused to adjourn.
The question being on the adoption of the amendment
submitted by Mr. Todd,
Mr. Sykes called the previous question;
The question being,
"Shall the main question be now put?"
T t, was decided in the affirmative.
The question being on the adoption of the amendment to
the amendment, submitted by Mr. Todd;
Mr. Marbury demanded the yeas and nays,
The demand being sustained,
The yeas and nays were called, and appeared as follows:
|
|
|
|
![clear space](../../../images/clear.gif) |