|
|
|
202
The question being on the adoption of the motion to re-
consider,
Mr. Jones, of Somerset demanded the yeas and nays;
The demand being sustained,
The yeas and nays were called, and appeared as follows:
AFFIRMATIVE.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Messrs.
|
Hebb,
|
Ridgely,
|
|
|
|
Goldsborough, P't
|
Hoffman,
|
Robinette,
|
|
|
|
Abbott,
|
Hopkins,
|
Russell,
|
|
|
|
Annan,
|
Hopper,
|
Sands,
|
|
|
|
Baker,
|
Jones, of Cecil,
|
Schley,
|
|
|
|
Barren,
|
Keefer,
|
Scott,
|
|
|
|
Brooks,
|
King,
|
Smith, of Carroll,
|
|
|
|
Cunningham,
|
Larsh,
|
Smith, of Wor.
|
|
|
|
Cushing,
|
McComas,
|
Sneary,
|
|
|
|
Daniel,
|
Mullikin,
|
Swope,
|
|
|
|
Davis, of Wash.,
|
Murray,
|
Sykes,
|
|
|
|
Dellinger,
|
Negley,
|
Thomas,
|
|
|
|
Earle,
|
Noble,
|
Todd,
|
|
|
|
Ecker,
|
layman,
|
Valliant,
|
|
|
|
Farrow,
|
Parker,
|
Wickard,
|
|
|
|
Galloway,
|
Pugh,
|
Wooden — 49.
|
|
|
|
Hatch,
|
Purnell,
|
|
|
|
|
|
NEGATIVE.
|
|
|
|
|
Messrs. Belt,
|
Duvall,
|
Marbury,
|
|
|
|
Berry, of P. Geo.,
|
Edelen,
|
Mitchell,
|
|
|
|
Billingsley,
|
Gale,
|
Miller,
|
|
|
|
Blackiston,
|
Harwood,
|
Morgan,
|
|
|
|
Bond,
|
Henkle,
|
Parran,
|
|
|
|
Briscoe,
|
Holly day,
|
Peter,
|
|
|
|
Brown,
|
Horsey,
|
Smith, of Dor.
|
|
|
|
Chambers,
|
Jones, of Sora.,
|
Stirling,
|
|
|
|
Clarke,
|
Kennard,
|
Stockbridge,
|
|
|
|
Crawford,
|
Lansdale,
|
Turner,
|
|
|
|
Dail,
Davis, of Charles,
|
Lee,
Mace,
|
Wilmer— 35.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So the question upon its adoption was decided in the
affirmative.
The question again recurring upon the adoption of the or-
der to close the debate, &c.,
Mr. Hebb moved to lay the order on the table.
|
|
|
|
 |
