clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings and Debates of the 1850 Constitutional Convention
Volume 101, Page 87   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

87


NEGATIVE.
Messrs. Morgan Dennis, James U. Hearn
Blakistone Dashiell Jacobs
Hopewell Williams Gwinn
Ricaud Hicks Stewart of Balt, city,
Lee Goldsborough Sherwood, of Balt.,
Mitchell Eccleston Presstman
Donaldson Phelps Ware
Wells Bowie Kilgour
Kent Tuck Davis
Weems Sprigg Waters
Bond McOubbin Anderson
Buchanan Wright Fitzpatrick
Dennis, John McMaster Smith—39.
So the amendment was rejected.
The question again recurred upon accepting the substitute;
Mr. Blakistone offered as a substitute for said substitute; the fol
lowing:
"Resolved, That the officers of this Convention shall receive
the compensation allowed to similar officers of the House of Dele
gates, at the last session of the Legislature."
Which was read.
Mr. Tuck, moved that the report and substitutes be laid on the
table.
Determined in the affirmative.
Mr. Presstman, submitted the following resolution
Resolved, That the several committees on the Constitution be
instructed to report by articles, such propositions as are to be sub
mitted by them for the adoption or rejection of this body, and that
no argumentative report or written explanation shall be made on
any subject by said committees.
Which was read, and
On motion of Mr. Bowie, laid on the table.
The Convention then resumed the consideration of the order of
the day, being the report submitted on the 20th inst., by Mr.
Stewart of Balt. city, chairman of the committee on reporting and
printing, in relation to the debates and proceedings of the Conven
tion.
The question before the Convention being upon the motion
of Mr. Blakistone, to amend said order by adding at the end of
3rd order, the following proviso
"Provided, that the expense of reporting and printing referred
to in the above orders, shall not exceed in the whole ten thousand
dollars during the entine session of the Convention."
On the question being put, "will the Convention adopt said
amendment ?" it was
Determined in the affirmative,
The question then recurred upon the amendment proposed
by Mr. Dorsey, to strike out the 1st and 2nd orders, and
Determined in the affirmative.


 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings and Debates of the 1850 Constitutional Convention
Volume 101, Page 87   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives