clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings and Debates of the 1850 Constitutional Convention
Volume 101, Page 703   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

703


mission to any office of trust or profit, than such oath of office as
may be prescribed by this constitution or by the laws of the State,
and a declaration of belief in the christian religion; and if the
party shall profess to be a Jew, the declaration shall be of a belief
in a future State of rewards and punishments."
Mr. Brent of Balt. city, moved the previous question, and being
seconded;
The question was then put,

Will the Convention reconsider their vote on the 33rd article of
said report?

Mr. Chambers, of Kent, moved the question be taken by yeas
and nays and being ordered appeared as follows:
AFFIRMATIVE—Messrs. Messrs. Chapman, Pres't, Morgan, Blak-
istone, Dent, Ricaud, Lee, Chambers, of Kent, Donaldson, Kent,
Seliman, Weems, Dalrymple, Bond, Sollers, Brent of Charles,
Bell, Golston, Dashiell, Williams, Hodson, Goldsborough, Phelps,
Miller, Bowie, Sprigg, McCubbin, Bowling, Spencer, Grason George,
Wright, Dirickson, McMaster, Jacobs, Sappirigton, Stephen
son, Carter, Stewart of Caroline, Hardcastle, Schley, Fiery,
Neill, Davis, Kilgour, Brewer, Waters and Srnith—47.
NEGATIVE—Messrs. Dorsey, Wells, Randall, Howard, Buchanan,
Welch, Ridgely, Lloyd, Sherwood of Talbot, Eccleston, McCullough,
McLane, Thomas, Shriver, Gaither, Biser, Ann an, McHenry, Magraw,
Nelson, Thawley, Gwinn, Stewart of Balt. city, Brent of Balt.
city, Ware, John Newcomer, Harbine, Michael Newcomer, Ander
son, Weber, Hoilyday, Parke, Ege, Shower, Gockey and Brown—36.
So the Convention reconsidered their vote on said article.
The question then recurred on the adoption of the amendment
as offered by Mr. Chambers, of Kent.

Mr. Brent, of Balt. city, moved the previous question, and
being seconded,

The question was put on the adoption of the amendment as
proposed by Mr. Chambers, of Kent,

Mr. Randall moved for a division of the question which was put
upon striking out;
Mr. Brent, of Balt. city, moved the question be taken by yeas
and nays, and being ordered appeared as follows:
AFFIRMATIVE—Messrs. Chapman, Pres't, Morgan, Blakistone,
Dent, Hopewell, Ricaud, Lee, Chambers of Kent, Donaldson, Kent,
Weems, Dalrymple, Bond ,Sol lers, Brent of Charles, Bell, Colston,
John Dennis, Dashiell, Williams, Hicks, Goldsborough, Phelps, Mil
ler, Bowie, Tuck, Sprigg, McCubbin, Bowling, Spencer, Grason,
George, Wright, Dirickson, McMaster, Hearn, Fooks, Jacobs,
Sappington, Stephenson, Carter, Hardcastle, Fiery, Davis, Kil-.
gour, Waters and Smith-----47.

NEGATIVE—Messrs Dorsey, Wells, Randall, Howard, B uchan
an, Welch, Ridgely, Lloyd, Sherwood of Talbot, Eccleston,
Mc Cullough, McLane, Thomas, Sh river, Gaither, Biser, Annan,


 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings and Debates of the 1850 Constitutional Convention
Volume 101, Page 703   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives