clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings and Debates of the 1850 Constitutional Convention
Volume 101, Page 702   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


702



Dennis, Dashiell, Williams, Hicks, Hodson, Goldsborough, Eccle
ston, Phelps, Bowie, Tuck, Sprigg, McCubbin, Bowling, Dirick
son, McMaster, Hearn, Fooks, Jacobs, Gaither, Carter, Schley,
Fiery, Davis, Kilgour, Brewer and Waters—41.
NEGATIVE—Messrs. Ricaud, Donaldson, Dorsey. Ridgely, Lloyd,
Sherwood, of Talbot, C olston, Constable, McCullough, Miller,
Grason, George, Wright Thomas, Shriver, Annnn, Sappington,
Stephenson, McHenry, Nelson, Thawley, Stewart of Caroline,
Hardcastle, Gwinn, Stewart of Balt, city, Brent of Balt. city,
Sherwood of Balt, city, Ware, Neill, John Newcomer, Harbine,
Michael Newcomer, Anderson, Weber, Hollyday, Fitzpatrick,
Smith. Parke, Ege, Shower, Cockey and Brown—41.
So the order was not adopted.

Mr. Bient, of Balt. city, submitted the following as articles of
the constitution, which he desired should be entered upon the
journal

1st. The court of Appeals shall upon the decision of every case
which has been argued in said court, give a decision in writing
upon the points arising in the record, and the Legislature shell
provide by law for the speedy publication of the decisions of the
court of Appeals, but no Judge shall report such decisions.

2nd. The Court of Appeals shall not refuse a procedenth in
any case at common law, which it may reverse so as to iuvoke by
such refusal the decision of any matter of fact proper to be sub-
nutted to a jury, nor shall any procedendo in any case be refused
when the court may be of opinion that a meritorious cause of
action or defence may be received on the further trial of the cause
by the amendment of the pleadings, or by the introduction of
further evidence.

On motion of Mr. Neill,
The Convention reconsidered their vote of yesterday on the
amendment offered by Mr. Miller, to the report of the commit
tee on the Legislative Department, and adopted by the Conven
tion, to be found on page 736 of Journal.

On motion of Mr. Neill,
Said section was amended by inserting after the word "compen
sation," these words "as agreed upon between the parties, or
awarded by a jury;"
The said section was then adopted as amended.

The Convention then resumed the consideration of the report
of the committee on the Declaration of Rights.

Mr. Chambers, of Kent, moved to reconsider the 33rd article,
to be found on page 293 of Journal, for the purpose of moving
the following amendment to same, by striking out from the word
‘‘or,'' in the 2nd line, to the word "State'' inclusive, and by in
serting as an additional article the following.

"That no other test or qualification ought to be required on ad-


 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings and Debates of the 1850 Constitutional Convention
Volume 101, Page 702   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives