490

Henry, Magraw, Nelson, Carter, Thawley, Stewart of Caroline,
Stewart of Baltimore city, Presstman, Ware, Michael Newcomer,
Brewer, Anderson, Hollyday, Slicer, Smith, Fitzpatrick, Parke,
Shower and Brown----42.
NEGATIVE—Messrs. Chapman, Pres't, Morgan, Blakistone
Hopewell, Ricaud, Lee, Chambers, of Kent, Mitchell, Dorsey
Wells, Randall, Weems, Dalrymple, Bond, Sollers, Jenifer, John
Dennis, James U. Dennis, Crisfield, Hodson, Phelps, Bowie,
Tuck, Sprigg, McCubbIn, Bowling, Dirickson, McMaster, Hearn,
Fooks, Jacobs, Sappington, Stephenson, Gwinn, Brent, of Balti
more city, Sherwood of Balt. city, Fiery, Kilgour and Waters—40.
So the Convention accept ed said substitute.
Mr. Chambers, of Kent, gave notice that he should move to
reconsider the vote of the Convention just taken on said substi
tute.
The question was then put on the adoption of the amendment.
Mr. Dirickson, moved the question be taken by yeas and nays,
and being ordered appeared as follows
AFFIRMATIVE—Messrs. Donaldson, Seilman, Howard, Buchan
an, Bell, Welch, Chandler, Lloyd, Colston, Constable, Cham
bers, of Cecil, McCullough, Miller, McLane, Spencer, Grason,
George, Wright, Thomas, Shriver, Johnson, Gaither, Biser,
McHenry, Magraw, Nelson, Carter, Thawley, Stewart of Caro
line, Stewart, of Baltimore city, Presstrnan, Ware, Fiery, Michael
Newcomer, Brewer, Anderson, Hollyday, Slicer, Fitzpatrick,
Smith, Parke, Shower and Brown—43.
NEGATIVE—Messrs. Chapman, Pres't, Morgan, Blakistone,
Hopewell, Ricaud, Lee, Chambers, of Kent, Mitchell, Dorsey,
Wells, Randall, Kent, Weems, Dairymple, Bond, Sollers,
Jenifer, John Dennis, James U. Dennis, Crisfield, Williams,
Hodson, Phelps, Bowie, Tuck Sprigg, McCubbin, Bowling,
Dirickson, McMaster, Hearn, Fooks, Jacobs, Sappington, Ste-
phenson, Gwinn, Brent, of Balt. city, Sherwood, of Balt, city,
Kilgour and Waters—40.
So the amendment was adopted.
rFhe question then recurred upon the adoption of the proviso, as
offered by Mr. Johnson, to the amendment offered by him.
Mr. Johnson, moved that said amendment be postponed, and
gave notice of his intention to call it up at some other time.
Determined in the affirmative.
Mr. Phelps, gave notice of his intention on to-morrow, to move
a reconsideration of the order adopted limiting the debate £fl the
Representation question to five minutes.
On motion of Mr. Brown,
The Convention took up for consideration the report of the
committee on the Judiciary, Department;