482

Dennis, Fiery, Michael Newcomer, Weber, Hollyday, Slicer and
Smith—10.
NEGATIVE —Messrs. Chapman, Prest. Morgan, Blakistone,
Hopewell, Ricaud, Lee, Chambers of Kent, Mitchell, Donaldson,
Wells, Sell man, Weems, Dalrym ple, Jenifer, Howard, Buchan-
an, Bell, Welch, Lloyd, Colston, John Dennis, Crisfield, Hicks,
Hodson Eccleston, Phelps, Chambers, of Cecil, Miller, McLane,
Bowie, Tuck, McCubbin, Spencer, George, Wright, Dirickson,
McMaster, Hearn, Fooks, Jacobs, Thomas, Shriver, Johnson,
Gaither, Biser, Sappington, Stephenson, McHenry, Magraw,
Nelson, Car ter, Thawley, Stewart, of Caroline, Hardcastle, Gwinn,
Brent of Balt. city, Sherwood of Balt. city, Ware, Kilgour,
Brewer, Waters, Anderson, Fitzpatrick, Parke, Show er, Cockey
and Brown—67.
So the Convention refused to accept the substitute.
The question again recurred upon the substitute as ofFered by
Mr. Jenifer.
On the question being put,
"Will the Convention accept said substitute ?"
Mr. Jenifer, moved the question be taken by yeas and nays, and
being ordered appeared as follows:

AFFIRMATIVE —Messrs. Chapman, Pres't, Morgan, Blakistone,
Ricaud, Chambers of Kent, Mitchell, Donaldson, ;Dorsey,
Randall, Kent, Sellman, Jenifer, Bowie, Tuck, McCubbin,
Spencer, Wright, Carter, Thawley, Stewart of Caroline, Kilgour,
Brewer, Waters and Anderson—24.
NEGATIVE—Messrs. Hopewell Lee, Wells, Weems, Dalrym
ple, Bond, Howard, Buchanan, Bell, Welch, Lloyd, Colston,
John Dennis, James U. Dennis, Crisfield, Hicks, Hodson,
Eccieston, Phelps, Chambers, of Cecil, Miller, McLane, George,
Dirickson, McMaster, Hearn, Fooks, Jacobs, Thomas, Shriver,
Johnson, Gaither, Biser, Sappington, Stephenson, McHenry,
Magraw, Nelson, Gwinn, W are, Fiery, Michael Newcomer,
Weber, Hollyday, Slicer, Fitzpatrick, Smith, Parke, Shower
Cockey and Brown—51.
So the Convention refused to accept the substitute.
The question then recurred upon the amendment as offered by
Mr. Johnson, for the second section of the report.
Mr. Johnson, moved to amend said amendment by striking
out in the 1st line thereof "seventy-five." and in the 15th line
by striking out after "Baltimore city,'' the word ‘ten;''

Mr. Shriver, moved fot a division of the question upon the first
branch of said amendment, down, to the ‘‘proviso" in the 22nd line.
Mr. Stephenson, renewed the notice of his intention to move a
reconsideration of the amendment offered by him on the 28th