clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings and Debates of the 1850 Constitutional Convention
Volume 101, Page 469   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

469

Hicks, Goldsborough, Eccleston, Phelps, Bowie, Sprigg, Mc
Cubbin, Bowling and Waters—29.
NEGATIVE—Messrs. Morgan, Blakistone, Dent, Hopewell,
Sollers, Jenifer, Howard, Buchanan, Bell, Welch, Chandler,
Ridgely, Lloyd, Coiston, Constable, Chambers, of Cecil, Miller,
McLane, Tuck, Spencer, Grason, George, Wright, Dirickson,
McMaster, Hearn, Fooks, Jacobs, Thomas, Shriver, Johnson,
Gaither, Biser, Annan, Sappington, Stephenson, McHenry, Ma
graw, Nelson, Thawley, Stewart, of Car. Hardcastle, Stewart, of
Balt, city, Brent, of Balt. city, Sherwood, of Balt. city, Presst
man, Ware, Fiery, John Newcomer, Harbine, Michael New
comer, Kilgour, Brewer, Anderson, Weber, Hollyday, Slicer,
Fitzpatrick, Smith, Parke, Shower, Cockey and Brown—63.
So the amendment was rejected.
Mr. Dorsey, then moved to amend said amendment as offered
by Mr. Fiery, by striking out in the 10th line the word "six," and
inserting in lieu thereof "seven;"
Mr. Tuck, rose to the following point of order, that the Con
vention having refused to strike out "three-fourths, and insert
"onehaif," it was not competent to offer an amendment which,
in effect, was substantially the same by changing the ratio.
The President ruled the amendment to be out of order.
The question again recurred upon the adoption of the amend
ment as offered by Mr. Fiery.
On the question being put,
"Will the Convention adopt said amendment?"
Mr. Tuck, moved the question be taken by yeas and nays, and
being ordered, appeared as follows;
AFFIRMATIVE.—Messrs. Howard, Buchanan, Bell, Welch,
Chandler, Ridgely, Lloyd, Coiston, Constable, Chambers, of Cecil,
Miller, McLane, Spencer, Grason, George, Wright, Thomas,
Shriver, Johnson, Gaither, Biser, Annan, McHenry, Magraw,
Nelson, Thawley, Stewart, of Caroline, Hardcastle, Stewart of
Balt, city, Sherwood, of Balt, city, Presstman, Ware, Fiery,
John Newcomer, Harbine, Michael Newcomer, Brewer, Ander
son, Weber, Hollyday, Slicer, Fitzpatrick, Parke, Shower,
Cockey and Brown—46.
NEGATIVE—Messrs. Chapman, Pres't, Morgan, Blakistone,
Dent, Hopewell, Ricaud, Lee, Chambers, of Kent, Mitchell,
Donaldson, Dorsey, Wells, Randall Kent, Sellman, Weems,
Dalrymple, Bond, Sollers, Brent, of Charles, Merrick, Jenifer,
John Dennis, James U. Dennis, Crisfield, Williams, Hicks,
Goldsborough, Eccieston, Phelps, Bowie, Tuck, Sprigg, McCubbin,
Bowling, Dirickson, McMaster, Hearn, Fooks, Jacobs, Sapping-
ton, Stephenson, Gwinn, Brent of Balt. city, Kilgour, Waters
and Smith—47.
So the amendment was rejected.


 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings and Debates of the 1850 Constitutional Convention
Volume 101, Page 469   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives