clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings and Debates of the 1850 Constitutional Convention
Volume 101, Page 458   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

458


Lee, Mitchell, Dorsey, Wells, Randall, Kent, Weems, Bond,
Sollers, John Dennis, James U. Dennis, Hicks, Goldsborough,
Tuck, Sprigg, McCubbin, Dirickson, McMaster, Hearn, Fooks,
Jacobs, Johnson and Kilgour—27.
NEGATIVE—Messrs. Donaldson, Sellman, Buchanan, Welch,
Chandler, Lloyd, Colston, Chambers, of Cecil, Miller, Bowie,
Spencer, Thomas, Shriver, Gaither, Biser, Annan, Sappington,
Stephenson, McHenry, Magraw, Nelson, Thawley, Stewart,
of Caroline, Hardcastle, Gwinn, Stewart, of Balt, city, Brent, of
Baltimore city, Sherwood, of Baltimore city, Presstman, Ware,
John Newcomer, Harbine, Michael Newcomer, Brewer, Weber,
Slicer, Fitzpatrick, Smith, Parke, Shower, Cockey and
Brown—42.
So the Convenmion refused to adjourn.
Mr. Bowie, moved for a call of the Convention, and tint the
Sergeant-at-Arms be sent after the absent members to enforce their
attendance.
The Convention having been called by the assistant secretary,
Mr. Brown, moved that further proceedings under the call be
dispensed with.
Mr. Tuck, rose to a point of order, and insisted that the Con
vention had no power to dispense with proceedings under the call
until the absentees had been sert for.
Mr. Weems, (being in the chair,) stated that a majority of the
Convention could control its own action, and therefore overruled
the point of order;
From which decision Mr. Tuck appealed;
On the cluestion being put,
Shall the opinion of the chair stand as the judgment of the
Convention?
Mr. Bowie, moved the question be taken by yeas and nays,
and being ordered appeared as follows
AFFIRMATIVE —Messrs. Chapman, Pres't, Blakistone, Hopewell,
Donaldson, Sellman, Jenifer, Howard, Welch, Ridgely, Lloyd,
Colston, Chambers, of Cecil, Miller, McLane, Sprigg, Bowling,
Spencer, George, Thomas, Shriver, Gaither, Biser, Annan, Sap
pington, Steph enson, M cHen ry, Magraw, N elson, Thawley,
Stewart, of Caroline, Hardcastle, Gwinn, Stewart, of Baltimore
city, Brent of Baltimore city, Sherwood of Balt. city, Presstman,
Ware, John Newcomer, Harbine, Brewer, Anderson, Slicer, Fitz
patrick, Smith, Parke, Shower, Cockey and Brown—48.
NEGATIVE—Messrs. Morgan, Ricaud, Lee, Dorsey, Wells,
Dalrytmple, Bond, Sollers, Buchanan, John Dennis, James U
Dennis, Crisfield, W illiams, Hicks Goldsborough, Phelps, Bowie,
Tuck, McCubbin, McMaster, Hearn, Fooks, Jacobs, Michael
Newcomer amid Kilgour----26.
So the Convention sustained the decision of the chair.


 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings and Debates of the 1850 Constitutional Convention
Volume 101, Page 458   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives