clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings and Debates of the 1850 Constitutional Convention
Volume 101, Page 431   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

431


Hollyday, Slicer, Fitzpatrick, Smith, Parke, Shower, Cockey
and Brown—49.
So the amendment was rejected.
Mr. Hicks, moved the Convention adjourn

Determined in the negative.

The question then recurred and was put upon the adoption of
the 2nd section as amended;

Mr. Chambers, of Kent, moved the question be taken by yeas
and nays, and being ordered, appeared as follows
AFFIRMATIVE. ——Messrs. Sellman, Brent, of Charles,
Mer rick an d An nan-----4.
NEGATIVE—Messrs. Buchanan, Pres't, pro tem., Morgan, Bla
kistone, Hopewell, Ricaud, Lee, Chambers, of Kent, Mitchell,
Donaldson, Dorsey, Wells, Randall, Kent, Weems, Dalrymple,
Jenifer, Howard, Bell, Welch, C handler, Loyd, Dickinson, Sher--
wood, of Tal. John Dennis, Crisfield, W illiams, Hicks, Goldsbo—
rough, Eccleston, , Phel ps, C ha mbers, of Cecil, Mc Cu llough, Miller,
McLane, Bowie, Tuck, Sprigg, McCubbin, Bowling, Spencer,
George, Dirickson, McMaster, Fooks, Shriver, Gaither, Biser,
Sappington, McHenry, Magraw, Nelson, Thawley, Stewart of
Caroline, Hardcastle, Gwinn, Stewart, of Balt. city, Brent, of
Balt. city, Sher wood, of Balt. city, Presstman, Ware, Schley,
Fiery, Neill, John Newcomer, Harbine, Davis, Kilgour, Brewer,
Waters, Weber, Hollyday, Slicer, Fitzpatrick, Smith, Parke,
Shower, Cockey and Brown—78.
So the 2nd section as amended was rejected.
Mr. Chambers, of Kent, then moved to amend said report by
substituting in place of the 2nd section stricken out, the following:
"Every county having a population of less than fifteen thou-
sand souls, shall be entitled to three delegates; every county
having a population of fifteen thousand souls and l ess t than twen-
ty five thousand, shall be entitled to four delegates, every county
having a population of twenty—five thousand and less than thirty—
five thousand souls, shall be entitled to five delegates, and every
county having a population of more than thirty—five thousand
sorris, shall he entitled to six Delegates; and the city of Baltimore
shall be entitled to the same number of delegates as the county
which shall be entitled to the largest representation ;"

Wh ich was read
Mr. Blakistone, moved the Convention adjourn;

Determined in the negative.

The question then recurred upon the adoption of the amend
ment as offered by Mr. Chambers of Kent

Mr. Chambers, of Kent. moved the question be taken by yeas
and nays, and being ordered appeared as follows:

 
AFFIRMATIVE Messrs. Morgan, Blakistone, Hopewell, Ricaud,



 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings and Debates of the 1850 Constitutional Convention
Volume 101, Page 431   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives