clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings and Debates of the 1850 Constitutional Convention
Volume 101, Page 430   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

430

AFFIRMATIVE----Messrs. B uchanan, Pres't, pro tem., Howard,
Bell, Welch, Chandler, Lloyd, Dickinson, Sherwood, of Talbot,
Chambers, of Cecil, McCullough, Miller, McLane, Spencer,
Grason, George, Wright, Shriver, Gaither, Biser, Annan, McHenry,
Magraw, Thawley, Stewart, of Caroline, Hardcastle, Stewart, of
Baltimore city, Presstman, Ware, Fiery, Neill, Harbine, Brewer,
Weber, Hollyday, Slicer, Fitzpatrick, Parke, Cockey and
Brown —39.
NEGATIVE-----Messrs. Morgan, Blakistone, Hopewell, Ricaud,
Lee, Chambers, of Kent, Mitchell, Donaldson, Dorsey, Wells,
Randall, Kent, Sell man, Weems, Dal rymple, Bond, Brent, of
Charles, Merrick Jenifer, Crisfield, Williams, Hicks, Goldsborough,
Eccleston, Phelps, Bowie, Tuck, Sprigg, McCubbin, Bowling,
Dirickson, McMaster, Fooks, Sappington, Gwinn, Brent, of Balti
more city, Sherwood, of Baltimore city, Schley, John Newcomer,
Davis, Kilgour, Waters, Smith and Shower —44.

So the amendment was rejected.
When Mr. Nelson's name was called, Mr. Magraw, stated that
Mr. Nelson had paired off on the Representation question with
Mr. John Dennis, and did not vote.
The question then recurred on the adoption of the 2nd section
as amended.
Mr. Jenifer moved further to amend said section by adding
at the end thereof the following proviso:
"Provided no county shall have less than three delegates;"

Mr. Shower, gave notice of his intention to move a reconsidera
tion of the vote of the Convention rejecting the amend
ment offered by Mr. Fiery, to the 2nd section of the report.

The question then recurred on the adoption of the amendment
offered by Mr. Jenifer, as a proviso to the end of the 2nd section.
Mr. Bowie, moved the question be taken by yeas and nays,
and being ordered, appeared as follows

AFFIRMATIVE---Messrs. Morgan, Blakistone, Hopewell, Ricaud,
Lee, Chambers, of Kent, Mitchell, Dorsey, Wells, Randall,
Kent, Weems, Dalrymple, Bond, Brent, of Charles, Merrick,
Jenifer, John Dennis, Crisfield, , W illiams, Hicks, Goldsborough,
Eccleston, Phelps, Bowie, Tuck, Sprigg, McCubbin, Bowling,
Dirickson, McMaster, Fooks, Davis, Kilgour and Waters—35.

NEGATIVE—Messrs. Buchanan, Pres't, pro tem., Donaldson,
Sellman, Howard, Bell, Welch, Chandler, Lloyd, Dickinson,
Sherwood, of Talbot, Chambers, of Cecil, McCullough, Miller,
McLane, Spencer, Grason, George, Wright, Shriver, Gaither, Biser,
Annan, Sappington, Nelson, McHenry, Thawley, Stew
art, of Caroline, Hardcsatle, Gwinn, Stewart, of Balt. city, Brent
of Baltimore city, Sherwood, of Baltimore city, Presstman, Ware,
Schley, Fiery, Neill, John Newcomer, Harbine, Brewer, Waber,


 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings and Debates of the 1850 Constitutional Convention
Volume 101, Page 430   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives