392

printed report, by striking out "four thousand," and inserting
"thirty six hundred;"

Mr. Tuck moved the previous question and being seconded;
The question was first put on the motion of Mr. Crisfield, on
striking out
Mr. Sappington, moved the question be taken by yeas and nays,
and being ordered appeared as follows:
A FFI RM A TIVE.----M essrs. Dent, Lee, Chambers, of Kent, Dorsey,
Dairvurple, Brent, of Charles, Lloyd, Dickinson, Sherwood, of
Talbot, Crisfield, Dashiell, W illiams, Eccleston, Phelps, Dirick
son, McMast er, Fooks, Shriver, Gaither, Biser, Sappington,
Nelson, Carter, Hardcastle, Schley, Fiery, John Newcomer,
liarbine, Davis, Brewer, Weber, Slicer, Smith, Parke, Shower
and Cockey---35.
NEGATIVE—Messrs. Blakistone, Pres't, pro tem., Hopewell,
Mitchell, Donaldson, Wells, Randall, Kent, Sellman, Weetns,
Sollers, Jenifer, Buchanan, Bell, Welch, Chandler, Hicks,
Hodson, Chambers, of Cecil, Bowie, Tuck, Grason, McHenry,
Magraw, Gwinn, Stewart, of Baltimore city, Brent, of Baltimore
city, Presst man, Ware, Kilgour, Waters, Hollyday, and Brown—32.
So the motion to strike out prevailed.
The quest ion was then put on the motion of Mr. Chambers, of
Kent, to fill the blank with ‘ ‘thirty—six h undred
The yeas and nays being orde:ed appeared as follows
AFFIRMATIVE-----Messrs. Blakistone, Pres't, pro tem., Dent,
Hopewell, Chambers, of Kent, Mitchell, Donaldsn, Wells,
Randall, Kent, Sellman, Weems, Sollers, Brent, of Charles,
Jenifer, Buchanan, Bell, Welch, Chandler, Lloyd, Dickinson,
Sherwood, of Talbot, Hicks, Hodson, Phelps, Chambers, of
Cecil, Miller, Bowie, Tuck, Grason, Shriver, Biser, McHenry,
Mcgraw, Gwinn, Stewart, of Baltimore city, Brent, of Balt. city,
Presstman, Ware, Kilgour, Brewer, Waters, Hollyday and
Brown—43.
NEGATI VE—Messrs. Lee, Dorsey, Dal rympl e, C risfield, Dashiell,
Williams, Eccleston, Dirickson, McMaster, Fooks, Gaither, Sap-
pington, Nelson, Carter, Hardcastle, Schley, Fiery, John New
comer, Harbine, Davis, Weber, Slicer, Smith, Parke, Shower
and Cockey—26.
So the blank was filled with "thirty-six hundred."
The question then recurred and was put on the adoption of the
21st section, as amended;
On motion of Mr. Dirickson,
The yeas and nays were ordered and appeared as follows:
AFFIRMATIVE—Messrs. Blakistone, Pres't pro tem., Dent,
Hopewell, Chambers, of Kent, Mitchell, Donaldson, Wells, Ran
dall, Kent, Sellamn, Weems, Sollers, Brent, of Charles, Jenifer,