clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings and Debates of the 1850 Constitutional Convention
Volume 101, Page 362   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 
 
362

Mr. Dorsey, moved for a division of the question upon striking
out.
Mr. McHenry, moved to amend said amendment, by adding at
the end thereof, the following:
"The credit of the State shall not, in any manner, be given or
loaned to or in aid of any individual, association or corporation,
nor shall the General Assembly have the power, in any mode, to
involve the. State in the construction of works of internal improve-
ment, or in any enterprise which shalt involve the faith or credit
of the State;"
Which was read.
Mr. McHenry, moved the question be taken by yeas and nays,
and being ordered appeared as follows:
AFFIRMATIVE.—Messrs. Chapman, Pres't, Blakistone, Dent,
Hopewell, Dorsey, Wells, Kent, Sellman, Weems, Sollers, Mer
rick, Bell, Welch, Chandler, Ridgley, Lloyd, Colston, James U.
Denn is, Dashiell, Hicks, H odson, Goldsborough, Eccleston,
Chambers, of Cecil, Miller, Sprigg, Bowling, McMaster. Fooks,
Shriver, Biser, Sappington, Stephenson, McHenry, Magraw,
Stewart, of Caroline, Hardcastle, Schley, Fiery, Neill, John New.
corner, Michael Newcomer, Kilgour, Ege, Cockey, and Brown—46.
NEGATIVE—Messrs. Ricaud, Lee, Chambers, of Kent, Mitchell,
Donaldson, Randall, Crisfield, Bowie, McCubbin, Spencer, Gra-
son, George, Thomas, Gaither, Annan, Thawley, Gwinn, Stewart,
of BaIt, city, Sherwood, of BaIt. city, Presstman, Ware, Harbine,
Davis, Weber, Hollyday, Slicer, Smith and Parke—28.
So the amendment to the amendment was adopted.
The question then recurred upon the adoption of the amend
ment as amended.
Mr. Sollers, moved to amend said amendment by striking out
the first branch of said amendment being that portion of the a—
mendment offered by Mr. Spencer.
Mr. Thomas, moved for a division of the question upon striking
out.
The question was then put on the motion of Mr. Sollers, to strike
out that portion of the amendment offered by Mr. Spencer, being
the 1st branch of the amendment; and
Determined in the affirmative.
The question their recurred upon the second branch of said
amendment;
On motion of Mr. Sollers,
Said amendment was amended by adding at the end thereof,
these words, "or make any appropriations therefor;"
The question again recurred upon the adoption of the second
branch of said amendment as amended;


 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings and Debates of the 1850 Constitutional Convention
Volume 101, Page 362   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives